Liverpool duo Mohamed Salah and Curtis Jones have been accused of conning umpire John Brooks in the Reds’ 2-1 win over Chelsea on Sunday.
Salah and Jones racked upward either side of a Nicolas Jackson equaliser for Enzo Maresca’s side to vanquished the Funks and preserve their one-determinant lead at the optimal of the Premier League.
Egypt international Salah was effective from the fine place after Jones was channeled down by Levi Colwill in the box after the Liverpool forward had previously felt that he’d been denied a place-kick.
Gary Neville said on the stay Heavens Sporting jobs commentary that Salah had been qualified to a yellow card for diving after his loss under a obstacle from Colwill.
And also beIN Sporting jobs presenter Richard Keys concurs via Neville and reckons both Salah and Jones were out to “con” the refereee.
Keys made in his blog: “It was billed as Liverpool’s initially vast test of the season. Turns out it wasn’t.
“I mistrusted Chelsea were passive and tremendously unsatisfactory and that description would most distinctly sum upward Cole Palmer’s payment too. I’m a mammoth Palmer supporter, yet he had a day to neglect – just four inoculations – none on target and he designed just one opportunity for his team coworkers. In complete, Chelsea just had two inoculations on target. Woodland issued a a lot stiffer test – and Liverpool failed that one.
“However on this party exposition farces around to Liverpool – they vanquished what was in front of them, regardless of a bunch of unexplainable verdicts from the ref.
MORE LIVERPOOL COVERAGE ON F365…
👉 Mail box: Toolbox celebrate for ‘imposing OK’ is ‘massively disingenuous to Liverpool’
👉 Ideal 24/25 Fantasy Premier League XI contains Guy Utd pair, Liverpool quartet and Everton standout
👉 Optimal 10 Premier League exits services Newcastle collapses and better last alerts for Liverpool
“My initially misgiving about his appointment would most distinctly be why? This was just his 2nd gallery of the season. It was also vast for him. He was way off the pace. Why supply him such a vast gallery when he hasn’t been reffing?
“Chelsea need to’ve had a pen before Brooks inevitably conferred Liverpool one. Sancho’s foot was just trodden on Kop run out. Pen. Why was there no review?
“Salah tried to con one out of Brooks before Curtis Jones did. You could listen to Brooks’ subconscious functioning ‘damn, I’ve just swiveled one down l, I’ll have to supply this’. Yes, there was call yet it was no added or a lot less than there had been on Sancho. It most distinctly wasn’t enough to send Jones toppling.
“I mistrusted the next off one might have been. Ok, Sanchez got something on the sphere, yet it reoccured towards impulse and had Jones not been channeled down he might readily have racked upward.
“By the way – Chelsea won’t win anything via Sanchez in impulse. He’s not wonderful enough.”
