Previous Premier League celebs Frank Leboeuf and Jay Bothroyd case Micky van de Ven need to be punished for the tackle which disgruntled Liverpool striker Alexander Isak as the Reds vanquished Tottenham 2-1 on Saturday.
The Reds came away wearing the three junctures from the Tottenham Hotspur Arena over the weekend break yet they are facing some naturally expensive injury clarification.
Although Liverpool have not officially evidenced the clarification, there is speculation that Isak penniless his leg once racking upward the opening ambition of the video game against Stimulates.
Isak had currently snatched his shot once Van de Ven lunged late into the challenge and accumulated injury to the Sweden global.
Van de Ven perpetuated to be clear of punishment as Liverpool obtained the reward of racking upward a ambition yet Leboeuf reckons the Tottenham protector warnings to face retrospective answers.
Previous Chelsea protector Leboeuf told ESPN: “I love the approach Micky van de Ven is behaving and the approach he plays football, and I love the gamer, yet he possesses to be punished.
“I’m sorry, you cannot avail out of that once you penniless the leg of a guy. You seize a opportunity, you’re a protector. I was a protector and never disgruntled any kind of gamer.
“You can tackle, you can be experimentation, yet you have to interpret and be in readjust of what you do. And, I’m sorry, in that manner, and the run out result says a considerable quantity, Van de Ven was not in readjust.
“And for me, that’s perhaps dispiriting, yet something possesses to come out. He cannot once again be sent out wearing nothing after that tackle.”
Ex-spouse-Cardiff Metropolis and Monarchs Park Rangers onward Bothroyd was of a tantamount opinion as Lebouef once showing up on Paradises Sports’ Ref Watch stress.
He asserted: “Van de Ven possesses not deliberately tried to misery Isak. Totally, he is negative to cease a ambition and he’s predicted across to cease the shot.
“This is an instance where, yes, Isak possesses racked upward, yet it need to still be a red card. He’s lunging, he’s acquiring in him. Every description you pine to posture for a red-card challenge is there. Since he’s racked upward, they’ve let it go.
“He’s lunged, he’s out of readjust. He’s attempting to make a block yet he’s never witnessing avail there. If that’s amidst the park, that’s a red card.”
MORE ON LIVERPOOL ON F365
* Liverpool outsiders in Semenyo race; winger possesses selection of Metropolis trophies or United wing-back role
* Gyokeres doomed in 2026 wearing Liverpool, Male Utd celebs correspondingly kit to be snubbed and/or unloaded
* Liverpool criterion historical run to preserve Premier League title; we can ‘principle them out’, Wazza…
Yet former Premier League referee Dermot Gallagher insisted it was not a sending off offence, he encompassed: “I can’t evaluate that he’s shouldered out anything that a footballer wouldn’t. I would be astonished if that was imparted as a red card wherever on the arenae.
“Gamers mistime challenges with one voice the time. He’s carefully late… it’s not a red card. Whether it be in the penalty locale, in the D, the centre circle or the coworker.”
Both Bothroyd and Gallagher agreed that it was the straighten out verdict to send out off Tottenham striking midfielder Xavi Simons in the initially half for a challenge on Virgil van Dijk.
Gallagher asserted on the Simons mischief-maker: “I pine to make clear that I don’t think Simons possesses any kind of intention to do this, yet he possesses shouldered out it. As unquestionably as you evaluate the replay, you can’t unsee it.
“When VAR visits that, in dynamic football, it is always witnessing be a red card. He’s unlucky, yet he is always witnessing evaluate red. You can’t make challenges pick that anymore.”
