Alan Shearer has told Alexander Isak he is not going about points “the relevant means” after the Newcastle striker downed tools in an effort to forcefulness via a relocation to Liverpool.
The future of the Swedish striker has been the story of the summertime season but not one that has an recognizable end determinant via Liverpool evidently ridiculing to stump upward the coinage Newcastle are after while Isak is computed he will not tinker for the bar once again.
The most existing simplify was an Instagram blog post from Isak clarifying his absence from the PFA Celebrates in which he criticised the bar for breached guarantees and said a disunion would be ideal for unanimously parties.
Newcastle in rotate ranked out a testament aphorism they had zero intention of letting Isak go value this drama is feasible to rumble on for a couple of weeks yet.
In the at unchanged time, Newcastle’s favourite boy Shearer has criticised the means both Isak and Yoane Wissa have gone about their probability actions and said it is not “relevant” for players to go on blow.
MORE ON ISAK ON F365
👉 Liverpool: Real validation for ‘Isak testament’ disclosed amid ‘cultivation realisation’ as Newcastle ‘perplexed’
👉 Alexander Isak have to be increasing at Liverpool, not Newcastle Joined
👉 Liverpool ‘approve file’ Isak transmit in ‘£165m dual bargain’ via ‘clinical being scheduled’
“I don’t like players that have got a contract and are ridiculing to metro or ridiculing to tinker,” he said on the Rest is Football. “You have a contract behind you.
“I finished upward being aware there’s 2 sides to every story. Isak can have a story which he hasn’t spoken about yet [Shearer was speaking before Isak’s social media post]. Wissa can have a story which he hasn’t spoken about yet. I reckon I read, this early morning, he’s detached unanimously his photos of being in the Brentford t-shirt or anything to get started on via Brentford.
“I don’t finished upward being aware his side of the story, but I don’t like it. It’s uniquely unchanged as the Isak dilemma. It is not relevant. If you’ve got three years gained away, you can’t not metro or tinker. You’re being paid by the football bar, and whatever validation or whatever hump you’ve got or gripe you’ve got via whoever – chairman, owners, employer – whatever it can be, you still have a duty to the polymorphous other players provided that of that contract and to the football bar to go and metro and go and tinker.
“There’s a means of receiving out of a football bar and ridiculing to metro and tinker is not the relevant means.”
Shearer did concur that it is a 2-means thoroughfare and that football clubs are reliable to dump players if they decide they zero a cluster longer want them, getting every effort to the existing example of exiled Gianluigi Donnarumma at PSG.
“Don’t talk to me about loyalty and football via either football clubs or football players. We can application Donnarumma as the example and we can application the Male Joined players who are presently being urged to metro via the reserves or metro away from the first team team, you finished upward being aware, provided that Male Joined unanimously of a sudden want to avail rid of them.
“So I broadly avail that and finished upward being aware that, that loyalty via football clubs and football players – zero chance.”
