Man Utd: Amorim is the 'mule' in the Ratcliffe 'dumpster fire' and could Lampard be the solution?

Ruben Amorim is the Manchester United ‘burro’ in the Sir Jim Ratcliffe ‘dumpster fire’ and has the F365 bias versus Frank Lampard been debunked?

Send your thoughts to [email protected].

Ruben Amorim the ‘burro’ in a ‘dumpster fire’
I typically concoct about Manchester United Football Bar given that they’re the club that anxiousness mine the plenty of, and it was at the aggravatingly inauguration of my fandom. In a letter to the Mail box sent on 26 Feb, I discussed that the club’s economic situation vis-à-vis PSR and UEFA spendings notions appears uninspiring.

The former beginners on loan presently (Rashford, Sancho, and Antony) will conceivably lend livelihood but can still exemplify a net loss, despite Rashford being undiluted profit* at every little thing charge. Placed his wages, Casemiro should go for every little thing appropriation they can render utilization, minus the price of every little thing percentage of his future wages the club will conceivably have to commission. Mason Place, also ,though he’ll carry in more. Erikson is out of contract in the summer. Garnacho can go, but I don’t go to a caboodle profit possibility there. Management can reckon it terrific to silver in on André Onana, though.

It wouldn’t astonish me to go to them storefront Bruno Fernandez, either. He’s their lone real match-victor, but he’s not horribly suited to the contraption their preceptor wants to play, he’s their plenty of beloved assett (nobody’s paying €60m for Rasmus Højlund), and lone Casemiro has better reported wages. His inbound transmit is in a comparable means long off the PSR tales, so it would conceivably go some means towards including them.

The squad has talent, but it’s mismatched and apparently being enlightened by an real burro from Portugal. I’m not terming him a donkey, I’m terming him unceasing. Every club needs at least one auxiliary development to readjust to, but Amorim inextricably won’t have it. It’s stymiing.

To an outsider, though, the hubris is pretty enjoyable. Specifically enacted on the leads of refurbishing also 4 of those players with more discussed and (hopefully) youthful players on a handbag of at terrific (or worst, as this would conceivably encompass advertising Bruno) £120 million. Placed the club’s current transmit victories price, it doesn’t bear supposing about.

And perhaps worst of unanimously: this squad inextricably isn’t don to pleasing and have few leads of bring that means. That’s a heck of a thing to case about a club prefer Manchester United. Relevant presently, they suggest me of Newcastle United in some of our less pleasing periods. As I’ve received older, I anticipate I’ve received more realizing given that I’m not acquiring it prefer I as soon as would conceivably have. I truly feel a miniscule undesirable for the supporters (plenty of of them) given that although I’ve literally noted my club relegated twice (and we were on track for thrice before the requisition) given that we last tested, our loss was never from such a top.

Every little thing we pic its owners, my club is at least more discussed-supervised these days than it don to be. F365’s coverage of Ratliffe’s unforced PR misjudgments, Ratty Trafford’s decrepitude, the Sancho and Rashford dramas, Amorim’s mulishness, the Dan Ashworth farces, and so on, and so on, paints a anticipate of MUFC’s surveillance that aesthetic layouts a caboodle prefer a dumpster fire. That can ever anticipate these humans to mend the club’s finances and quiet the noisy neighbors? Uninspiring, I inform you.
Chris C, Toon Platoon DC (*I hate that I have to describe players as undiluted profit presently, instead of abode-thrived. Real silver has benefited players — thanks to their union — league executives, and television networks, but to my subconscious, it hasn’t been terrific for the sporting activity.)

F365’s Lampard bias
Long-time clients here (15+ years). I don’t concoct in occasionally, but this has been resting with me for a while. Football365 has always been my go-to for football point of perceive—until newly. Over the last few years, I’ve initiated to notification a experimentation editorial bias creeping in, and I longed to test whether this was inextricably me being sensitive or if there was something to it.

The most convenient means I sensed this was in your coverage of Frank Lampard. Now, I render utilization it—he hasn’t strategy the planet alight as a boss.

Derby: 6th to 6th
Chelsea: 3rd to 4th (with a transmit restraint, blooding childhood, FA Cup final)
Everton: 17th to 17th (conserved them from relegation but then wheels dropped aloof)
Chelsea interim: adversity
This is a perfunctory managerial record at terrific. Yet despite that, the sheer level of disdain, negativity, and outright aggressiveness in your coverage feels exceedingly disproportionate. Lampard render intakes mocked and torn aloof much more than other equally (or also worse) underperforming employers—also those with also worse documents and much less goodwill in the gallery.

So, I discerned to test my bias objectively. I ran a tone estimate of the last 50 points out of Lampard on F365, Nondiscriminatory.com, and The Preservationist. Listed underneath’s what I spotted:

1. Football365 is overwhelmingly undesirable (70-80%)
Your coverage of Lampard is repetitively deplorable and derisive, occasionally going past criticism into mockery.

Words prefer “hopeless,” “shame,” “should retire,” “zero strategy, zero craze, zero hope” are don typically.
Duplicating ironical tropes prefer “L-L-L-Lampard” (reoccuring the ‘L’ for losses) are never used to other stopping working employers in the awfully same means.
Develop-ups have freely checked why he render intakes work at unanimously, mounting his profession as “privilege and celebrity over merit”.
One column contacted him as “a managerial shame” (your words, not mine).

2. The Preservationist – Nonessential unprejudiced & contextualized
The Preservationist slammed Lampard as soon as results were undesirable, but without the sneer.
Criticism was occasionally implicit or couched in estimate, rather than put-downs.
They guided out expanse for Tuchel’s worship of Lampard’s Chelsea heritage, discussed Everton’s board dysfunction, and contextualized challenges prefer Chelsea’s transmit restraint.
Recognized Lampard’s successes with childhood players, rather than inextricably dethroning his entire tenure as a blackout.
This astonished me given that as a taken off leaning organisation, to my subconscious Lampard (as a supposed Tory) would conceivably have been someone they can professionally prefer to be quite deplorable on

3. Nondiscriminatory.com – principally neutral & directly reporting
Nondiscriminatory.com stuck to valid updates, pricing bid specialists, employers, and match records.
Also undesirable coverage (Craig Burley’s “slicing board” criticism) was bridged to specialists rather than editorial voice.
It reported optimistic moments equally—Conte as soon as contacted Lampard “a future planet-course boss”, and Nondiscriminatory lended that as a caboodle expanse as undesirable tales.
Most certainly no ironical or derisive tone—inextricably straightforward football journalism.

4. Overvaluing Lampard’s Profitability at Coventry
Now, here’s the kicker. Lampard is literally applying nicely as Coventry boss. The Athletic, The Preservationist, and others have initiated recognizing his work, but F365? Silence (and zero, the Planet football chunk implements not matter).

Once he was stopping working, the collection-on was perpetual. Yet presently? Most certainly no rustic pie. Most certainly no “hey, perhaps we were also deplorable”. If the places was sincerely impartial, shouldn’t it apply the awfully same power in both instructions?

So, My Misgiving to You Is…
Is this cut-and-dried editorial bias?
Or has F365 inextricably been in “exchange mode” for goodbye that it’s come to be the default tone?
I fully anticipate some eye-yawping from the editors reading this. Conceivably you’ll laugh it off and case “It’s inextricably football exchange, colleague.” Conceivably you’ll departure this with auxiliary snark (which, by the means, would conceivably inextricably affirm my time).

Or perhaps—inextricably perhaps—you’ll prevent for a second and ask: Are we literally being bazaar here?

Anyway, execute with this what you will conceivably.

Cheers,
Con Kan

A thoughtful perceive of football
Hello there again F365ers,

Will, thank you aggravatingly a caboodle for that.  I remember outcries versus Hicks and Gillette and the requisition by Contemporary England Sporting activities Ventures (presently Fenway Sporting activities Team) but I didn’t remember the courtroom bathing.  Listed underneath are more gliding doors moments.

I’m not a fanatic of any fussy club.  At the expire of a long hard day (and I’ve had also the majority of of them) I inextricably pine to watch the terrific pieces of the terrific football obtainable on liberate telly.  I occasionally loss asleep before it’s completed but either means by the next off day I’ve occasionally forgotten what happened and have to filter it upwards which are some justifications why I don’t commission hundreds of quid a year to watch keep football.  Similarly I’d neglect as soon as it’s on keep also though it’s occasionally on at the awfully same time plenty of weeks.  If there’s been a conspiracy theory I probably rested through it or neglected it.  Sorry.

I pine the terrific crew to win (also if it’s a crew I don’t prefer), equally nice groups to draw and unanimously groups to render utilization more discussed over time.  Chelsea’s players downing gizmos every few years, Individual Utd crumbling in phases and José Mourinho revolving into the Ricky Gervais of football have been the terrific comedy on TV.  Individual Utd supporters vacating Ratty Trafford at half time as soon as their crew were being outmatched by Liverpool in October 2021 was my favourite (thank you Paradises Sporting activities for the aerial shots) but I tend to favor chummy contests to comedy thrashings.  In future perhaps lone one comedy club at a time or readjust them more occasionally, please.  And please can Leeds come upwards again but be more discussed?

In the last years and a half I’ve gained tailing Liverpool more than anybody else.  I suched as tailing them under Kenny Dalglish and Brendan Rodgers (Luis Suárez was a breathtaking nice gamer) but Jürgen Klopp was the terrific boss for Liverpool and at their terrific his groups were entirely attractive.  The remodeling of Manchester Municipal has been nice to watch but what has happened to Liverpool is renovation.  I slightly remember the Liverpool of the 1970’s and 1980’s (Kenny Dalglish was a breathtaking nice gamer but it’s a undoing about the attacking and racially abusing humans) but I favor Klopp’s Liverpool given that they had more chummy rivals and stayed with the 1992 ago pass preeminence (optimal 70’s/80’s Liverpool enacted ago to the keeper a caboodle).

Manchester Municipal and Pep Guardiola can have won more prizes but Liverpool under Klopp were more discussed to watch.  The current title races in between Municipal and Liverpool have been terrific given that they have inextricably gone full throttle to win as the majority of games and score as the majority of purposes as imaginable for months (and as soon as Arsenal have signed upwards with in and implemented the awfully same it’s been also more discussed).

Will, I reckon you’re entirely correct that if the 2010 courtroom bathing you marketed had gone the other means Liverpool’s rebirth doesn’t snatch place.  Liverpool’s downward spiral can have bolstered and Manchester Municipal can have won 7 titles in a row, plenty of or unanimously of them professionally.  The Premier League can have come to be a one-steed race prefer Ligue 1 did with first Lyon and then PSG, the Bundesliga did with Bayern, Serie A did with Juventus and Scottish football has repetitively with Celtic and Rangers both pleasing nine titles in a row.  In their times Wenger, Mourinho and Klopp unanimously derailed a Manchester club controling the Premier League.

We are typically verified slow-moving motion replays of takes on and freeze structures of offside telephone calls whereby refereeing verdicts are guided out based on obscure evidence or blathers upwards enticed by a computer system.  I’m still bring my head about the hunch that a football club that was a jobs crew from Lancashire & Yorkshire Railway’s Newton Health depot and a football club that was founded by St. Mark’s Church in West Gorton both went on to come to be victors of Europe.  Now the former is had by a family members from Contemporary York and a chemicals establishment and the latter is had by a member of the Abu Dhabi royal family members.

Why did those things snatch place?  What execute the Glazer family members, INEOS and Sheikh Mansour render utilization out of possessing English football bars?  What renders the debate in between victories and blackout, not inextricably over ninety mins but over a season and in each moment of a match?

Ex-players and journalists can aid reply such anxieties but perhaps historians or sociologists can aid also.  If I was a Social Sciences student presently I would conceivably concoct a theorem on football (“The inspires on on-field capabilities in football of the manifestos of Margaret Thatcher and Jimmy Hill”) and then concoct to Sir Jim Ratcliffe inquiring for a chore and inform him that if they lug on as they are and as they strategy to Manchester United will conceivably not win the Premier League again in Gary Neville’s lifetime, also if he resides to be 100.  That has more economic debt: Individual Utd or the perfunctory student?

In some coatings humans compare football reinforces to chess but football is much more perplexing.  Football is a gallery of choice and possibility.  It’s a gallery in which over more than 150 years the majority of humans have unanimously at once guided out the majority of services (some about slit-seconds or millimetres and some about spendings millions on bring a gamer or a billion on manufacture a arena) but expire results can be urged by collisions which are obscure or unpreventable.  Now humans can analyse reinforces with computer systems which generate vast quantities of statistics and sprinted thousands of simulations to forecast that will conceivably win the title but execute any of them encompass a crew’s terrific gamer bring outlawed for months for kung-fu kicking a fanatic in the chest?

In 1997 a computer system overtaken planet chess champ Garry Kasparov.  I don’t reckon a computer system taking care of a crew of footballing robotics can ever overtaken a wizard bound in the history of football such as Sir Alex Ferguson, Pep Guardiola or Jürgen Klopp that sought to adhere to in the footprints of their heroes.  Football is a component of human history that zero computer system or enterprises guy can ever sincerely interpret and it’s lingering to sharpen.

TL;DR – if you pine to interpret football more discussed dare thieving advantage of the recommendations and means of the social scientific researches given that football is about relationships and society.

Your own philosophically,
You Can Call Me Al (“He aesthetic layouts about, about.  He sees angels in the architecture, spinning in eternity”)

Liverpool blessing and the Klopp handover
I reckon I mail this fussy inquiry in every 18 months, but sensed that Maitland-Niles was again nice at correct ago for Lyon in the Europa League. This is a lad that’s won prizes at correct ago, taken off wing ago, and main midfield. He was ‘in and about’ the crew at Roma. He can (should?) have had the profession of james milner or ashley young, but instead he’s in obscurity in France. What happened in that last year at arsenal? Habitually rated him. Can plunked away a penalty also. A missed out on strategy. I interpret things didn’t go terrific at Saints, but still.

Grateful Jose past to Rangers. He’s not won a league title in a years, is yet again coordinating more collection-ons to umpires, and presently under lawful response for racism. In fact desire we’d inauguration referring to him as that lad that stuck his thumb in a males eye for zero element, rather than the wizard that took Champions League semi-finalists (2018) Roma to the extraordinary elevations of Conference League title (2022). Hope Rangers can render utilization it over the spiel upwards, and aid condemn this perforate to the history tales.

You can’t case that Klopp did a more discussed chore of running away a club than Fergie did, enacted on that I skepticism Klopp certified he was running away the club as soon as he’d guided out a digit of fulcrum verdicts. One guy certified he was off so apparently guided out some short term verdicts, one guy didn’t and so his verdicts came out more discussed over a a caboodle longer duration. Yet was that readjust planning, or inextricably a guy not attempting to sabotage himself? Shows up a aggravatingly inexplainable contrast to render in between the pair.

The tiresome thing about being contacted “jammy tossers” is that the awfully same final thoughts are never used the other means. Once you win using sheer blessing you suitably render utilization jibes and exchange, but as soon as you lose in a tantamount style though, the crunch is you past to ‘nous’ and cleverness. Or inextricably match records that bare zero relation to fact. For every gallery whereby LFC plainly nicked it (2005 apparently, this week), I can professionally point out instances whereby results were unjust. In both the 2022 victors league final, and the 2007 final, LFC were the more discussed side and past. Wrapping up upwards by the nude eye test, the match records and minute-by-mins that are still electronic, and the stats taped, LFC were the more discussed side in both instances. Wear’t recall the blog posts imparting debts by proxy, so why are there blog posts critiquing your blessing as soon as it goes the other means?

The other thing about forcing blessing is it comes as soon as you caution it – but as soon as you caution it isn’t always versus the hardest situation. Going unanimously the means ago to 2001 Uefa mug win, the terrific side LFC encountered were the Roma crew that won the italian title that year. LFC and in fussy Owen, battered them. Yet as soon as facing Barcelona, that were not a expanse on that side, LFC were aggravatingly privileged to create and relied on an idiot handball for the crucial penalty. So a prize won on blessing, but not versus the hardest situation. How execute you quantify that, on the level and usefulness and attainment of a side?

Also the 2018 (‘Karius’) final, again to Madrid. Overcoming Real and leading 9-2 on shots before salah’s injury, yet to also confront a inoculation on target until the 51st minute as soon as our keeper lended them a faucet in, and also then lone behind for 4 mins before levelling. By every metric and the eye test, LFC the more discussed side, and can have been going into the last 30 mins leading. Instead, the gallery swivelled on yet an additional Karius mistake. there was entirely nothing in between those sides expressing LFC’s keeper. Yet I don’t recall the match records in 2018 being about blind blessing or gamesmanship from Ramos? Or in 2020, and on track for a possibility 3rd final in 3 years, lone to lose at abode to Atletico Madrid with an xG of 2.9  to 1.1, 35 initiatives to 10, and 102 strikes to 23 (one hundred strikes to 23).

I’ll snatch the exchange as soon as you win with blessing, and temper (given that rivalry is occasionally about that, and revelling in it) but as soon as it becomes humans entirely bring irk by it, or believed chunks attempting to analyse it, I kinda reckon we’re moving away from what sporting activity is supposed to instruct you.
Tom G

MORE LIVERPOOL COVERAGE ON F365
👉 5 impending Liverpool top priorities for Port amid near-terrific season encompass Alisson, Alexander-Arnold
👉 Overvaluing Arsenal, Liverpool and Manchester United to literally savour a week of football TV
👉 5 justifications why Liverpool title win needs an asterisk prefer the last one
In which’s the ‘real’ Arsenal fanatic?
OK, I waited until Friday mornings mailbox was let loose, so here goes.

In which is the lone real, inform as it is, don’t loss for the Arteta rubbish, or our hodgepodge of bottlers, Arsenal ‘fanatic’ Stewie? Simply couldn’t aid himself the other day, thrashing our thrashing of PSV. Educating us unpredictable, Johnny come newly supporters, to hose pipeline down, as placing 7 past PSV away from abode in the last 16 of the CL, is usual Arsenal level track bullying. I perfunctory, football club and its supporters acquiring a vast win? What next off?? Reaping sex??!!

Anyway, moving on, our neighbors attended the Netherlands and came abode empty handed. Now, it’s lone the first leg and I elaborate them to rotate it about next off week, but for presently, LOL!! Sorry for being a plastic fanatic that cherishes a nice thrashing and laughs at his neighbors applying what they execute terrific. Most certainly Stewie the ‘real’ Arsenal fanatic would conceivably be here to inform us unanimously about our neighbors ailments, viewing that’s how supporters occasionally execute things. Unless of course Stewie isn’t literally a real Arsenal fanatic? I jest…

I will conceivably presently protocol aloof for the real Arsenal fanatic, Stewie, to strategy things correct with paragraphs of wound and paste rantings. I’ve been attempting my terrific to not respond to his entirely pathetic tirades but he keeps bring let loose (ooh, those clicks…) so here I am. Feel more discussed already.

As an aloof, I miss Barry Fox, given that for unanimously his enjoyable declarations on what his beaus football crew are acquiring required in attain as soon as the goings nice, he at least it verifies he cherishes his club. Stewie, the ‘real’ Arsenal fanatic on the other hand.
Johnny Comes Lately.

An irk and a tragedy
I was fairly astonished the places had zero reference of probably the best astonish/irk in last evening’s European games. Rangers a crew that are on a unsolicited sprinted , newly at abode to Queens Park being plunked out the Scottish mug supervised to win madly well in Istanbul versus a crew supervised by memorable one. Barry Ferguson a rookie boss, with zero European situation supervised to outfox Mourinho. The margin of win should of been better than the 3-1 feat.  Scottish football is occasionally frowned upon but this was a tremendous usefulness.

A Rangers fanatic however past his vitality in Istanbul whilst over for the gallery vacating behind a young boy. A real tragedy as soon as these things snatch place in football. 100k already lifted to render utilization him abode and aid his family members. Donate here.

RIP Christopher
Neil, Glasgow

Readjusting offsides
I don to faultlessly equip with Jason, Singapore.

Similar thing happened to Aguero v spurs a few years ago. Once the ball is tinkered he is marginally offside. Yet he literally runs ago towards his own purpose to render utilization the ball and by that stage he ‘would conceivably’ be in an onside stance (by a few feet!!). Nondiscriminatory fastened versus, spurs knock metropolis out.

By the letter of the law this was unanimously terrific. He was in an offside stance as soon as the ball was tinkered. That’s black and white and I’m not arguing about that.

I inextricably didn’t reckon it strengthened the vitality of the law and reasoning and adaptability should apply.

Yet then someone marketed that the protectors were pressed upwards as much as they were to dare to catch the gamer offside. This lended them the terrific possibility to safeguard whereby the ball was without possessing to apprehension about the players in an offside stance.

If the notions allowed for the adaptability you are arguing then the protectors can not have pressed upwards so much.

So, the situation that literally happened is lone likely to snatch place with the notions as they are. To apply adaptability as I risked to for metropolis, and you’re attempting to for psg, is to neglect the fact that the entire mount was for the information notions that are in expanse.

If we add in adaptability we add in brand-new requirements that would conceivably brunt how recommends behave. Conceivably they’d always sit deeper and so on.

And it would conceivably in a comparable means reinforce one of the plenty of loathed things in football… the scarcity of consonance in the subjective verdicts of refs and their underlings.

Execute we sincerely pine to plunked more matter on in the subjectivity of the awfully same humans that basically zero fanatic trust funds already?

The one subjective expanse of offside (interference with play) already justifications crunch, please don’t add in more.

Most certainly no, sorry Jason, I don to equip but I reckon we have to retain offside as clear it as we can.
Joe – lfc

Most certainly no Jason from Singapore, zero. Simply prevent it!!

He’s inquiring for the offside law to be readjusted to enable “some adaptability and situational context” given that Kvaratskhelia gained zero merit from being offside in the build upwards to his offside purpose.

Supply me a reprieve colleague. He was more discussed to the ball. How is that not an merit?

I’m not sincerely here to object that though, my meaty time being, my point of perceive varies to your own so how in heck execute you anticipate the renovation of adaptability and situational context to render verdicts more discussed/easier/more bazaar.

Nonessential importantly, the element that VAR is such a clusterf*ck is satisfactorily given that of situational context on plenty of verdicts. “Did Konate shoulder barge him in the ago or the shoulder?”, “Was Lewis-Skelly’s situation rebellious, high and out of manipulate?”.

The one thing VAR is nice for is offside. The ONE thing!! You’re either past the second last gamer or not. It’s black and white. Whether it’s millimetres or metres is fruitless.

Please prevent attempting to insert more subjectivity and crunch into football verdict administering and inextricably welcome the verdicts, we’d unanimously have a a caboodle more discussed time without unanimously the meaningless bawling and gnashing of teeth.
Adam LFC York (They had 26 other shots from which they can have scored!)

The Konate nasty
to Tom, Leaning in

A bazaar penalty is shoulder to shoulder, joints (on the contact side) versus the physique, with each gamer possessing at least one foot on the progression and both attempting to gain manipulate of the ball.

I don’t reckon you can case that about Konate’s situation, inextricably given that umpires neglect and the majority of other players render utilization away with it, doesn’t perfunctory it’s not a nasty.

Talking of fouls, umpires prefer to neglect

“Hindering the create of an foe means moving into the foe’s trail to interfere with, block, interfere with or brunt a readjust of instructions as soon as the ball is not within tinkering closeness of either gamer.”

Never go to this one used and an additional Virgil is often guilty of
JD

In which are unanimously the dazzlers?
An ratty MUFC as soon as alerted me a story… Once George Above reproach came to territory (to play football I reckon!), there would conceivably be an auxiliary 5-10,000 get required in, inextricably to watch him.  And then a inquisitive phenomenon usurped. Once the ball came to him, the whole throng would conceivably go…quiet. Human beings would conceivably veritably grip their breath and metaphorically be on the side of their benches (as it was terracing in those days) in hunch of what he would conceivably execute.

I always believed this was fairly of a apocryphal story from an ratty guy thinking recommend about past age, until someday I was privileged enough to go to Lionel Messi keep, at the Bernabeu zero less, and I’ll be clogged if the particular awfully same thing didn’t snatch place. If I filter ago, I have truly fingered also in awe, to a limited level, as soon as I would conceivably go to Ronaldinho and Zidane on TV. Locally alas, the light has not shone as lovely or as occasionally, although such names as Ronaldo, Henry, Rooney have temporarily dazzled.

Yet here’s the rub… I cannot recall ONE gamer in EPL in the last 5 years, and perhaps more, that has enchanted me the awfully same means. The days of slaloming runs, defeating 2, 3 players seem long gone. Educated out of toddlers ages ago, replaced by tactical alertness. The irony is, defeating the first defender literally emits perturb as every other defender has to readjust.

Every as soon as in awhile, a Salah or a Saka can have an unplayable day, but if you weren’t already a fanatic, would conceivably you literally go out of your means to go and watch them keep? Someone affirm me dishonest!
Adidasmufc (Personally, I reckon there have been few players with a first touch and football brain prefer Berbatov!)