Marc Guehi and Sam Morsy are still dominating the Mail box yet one Liverpool supporter plainly wouldn’t want him any place direct his club.
Send out your perceives on this – and the midweek football – to [email protected]
Has Marc Guehi screwed himself?
Marvelous to read unanimously the news on Morsy and Guehi. I’m impressed at G Thomas, Mithram and Clive not knowing the point of the disagreement to the point it almost appears calculated. It’s consumer ideological backgrounds yes, yet its’ hunting behind the protection of ‘my religion tells me to’ as if it’s not his culpability.
So yes G Thomas, Morsy is saying he’s homophobic yet without basically saying it. Zero Mithran, being birthed appropriate into discriminatory ideological backgrounds is not a protection. And also you without a uncertainty don’t have to literally/verbally torment a man in the past you a pondered a racist/homophobe and so on Clive. Humble gestures prefer this from Morsy and Guehi execute unanimously the chatting. Correspondingly, leeway of speech is not the genuinely same as saying anything without result.
This gesture from Morsy and Guehi is an responsive, recognizable middle finger to any man not appropriate and truthfully I cant assume an armband is amassing such a complication for these two. If it’s such a burden then they have to have purely passed armband on for a week or two. As a club captain, the committals spread far and showing the club is one of them.
You don’t avail to pick and opt what obligations you have and don’t avail to pick and opt what particles of your religion you can espouse without transmitting. What are they interfered around? Wearing an armband doesn’t out them as gay and neither does it say they partake in any vacancies that are. It’s not some sorcery towel that ‘turns’ them gay either. It’s purely a miniscule odd for them to be so loath of it.
Incidentally, I’ve devised to Ipswich to ask why its ok for the club captain to be outspoken on this topic, yet ok wearing video gaming and booze. He is meeting to wear a t shirt without a sponsor – Chelsea possessed a entirety junior of them this period bear in mind. Why not purely execute that Mr Morsy? Or Mr Guehi? I cant equilibrium the pointer that a one off gesture will send out them to a job time in purgatory yet a entirety period is wholeheartedly okay. Altogether for reference;
- Morsy played over 30 times for Middlesbrough in the 2020-21 period where their kit sponsor was video gaming utility provider 32Red
- Morsy in a identical means played over 40 times for Wigan Athletic in the 2019-20 period where their kit sponsor was video gaming utility provider kb88.
- ITFC are presently partnered wearing video gaming utility provider 8xbet, that in a identical means are a sis utility provider of video gaming firm BK8 freshly divulged as possessing overtly specific adult commercializing and advertising
- In the two periods preceding Morsy’s arrival at the club, ITFC’s kit was sponsored by video gaming utility provider Magical Vegas
- Morsy possesses in a identical means played in the FA Mug as rapidly as it was sponsored by Budweiser
Liquor, video gaming and immodest behaviour. With one voice disobediences, unanimously denounced by Islam, unanimously wholeheartedly okay to turn a blind eye to. Yet an armband for a one off gallery is the queue that cant be crossed? This isn’t religion, it’s consumer prejudice masquerading as religion and it’s admitting it without basically saying the words.
Yet now I in a identical means assume of denotations for the two of them. Morsy is 33 and possesses 18 months to go on his dedication, he’ll prospective surf through it out and decrease down the leagues for the last few years of his career so prospective won’t have to face this again. Yet Marc Guehi? Has he purely ravaged his opportunities of a burly slide now? Of the nightclubs that are a footfall up and can handle him and in a identical means criterion a brand-gimmicky CB – Liverpool won’t touch him now, perhaps Newcastle yet they could be shopping a miniscule less pricey. Chelsea perhaps yet they currently have a bazaar few CBs on the novels.
Correspondingly appreciation around England, would possibly it be thinkable he’s slid down the seniorities in specification of wide variety? Has he now posed himself snugly in the bracket of “on stand by for celebrations”, the type of player that is picked in the initially 30 team yet not in the last 23? I’m arguably over presuming the results to be uncomplicated yet the last remark I’d vacate is that Messrs Guehi and Morsy (and some mailbox donors) execute need to ended up up being aware what resistance actually is.
Savo, LFC
How can Sam Morsy be corroborated ‘appropriate’?
G Thomas in the Mailbag possesses asserted that “history will confirm” Sam Morsy “appropriate” as rapidly as “this virtue signalling trash is long neglected.”
I would possibly love for G Thomas to termed on selectively what is attending confiscate place in the next few years to lead to this eventuality? Does he assume that gay human beings will purely avail fed up wearing being gay and steer clear of? Or perhaps they will be received rid of instead and we can neglect unanimously around them?
This is the thing wearing these appropriate-wing snows. Scrape the surface of their “inquiry for leeway of speech” mien even a little miniscule and you divulge a altogether xenophobic ideology which literally denies the comportment of human beings that aren’t prefer them.
LGBT human beings exist, and will bolster to execute so. They play in your football junior, they rest beside you in the stands, they rest across from the supper table from you at Christmas. Of course, even you G Thomas.
How history could perhaps confirm Sam Morsy “appropriate” in this pod is past me, pub a finalize and fierce project of intolerance and persecution. If that’s what you want, at least say it wearing your upper body, and steer clear of hunting behind this documents-slim veneer of Defender of Extricate Speech. Zero one buys it.
Matt, Dublin
MORE ON THE ARMBAND ARGUMENT FROM F365
👉 Manchester Joined takeoff endorsement as garments discontinuity pit by one player’s LGBTQ+ position
👉 ‘Flawlessly done Sam Morsy’ and miscellaneous other supporter perceives after rainbow armband position
👉 Sam Morsy, the rainbow armband, indefensible Ipswich and how tolerating intolerance is never the means
…Boatloads of the “you say you’re tolerant, yet then you criticise the xenophobic” ‘disagreement’ in the mailbox this early morning. Find out to confiscate some criticism, you whiny, whiny offspring.
Jim, LFC
…Wonderful to listen to from G Thomas, The Netherlands; “Attractiveness at the disgust on the pro-Palestinian and trans-protestors’ confronts as rapidly as they are demonstrating”.
I would possibly suggest Mr Thomas to study how numerous Palestinian footballers have been slaughtered throughout the last 14 months by the suburban still made it possible for to linger in football despite these crimes, and avail endorse to us unanimously on what real “disgust” ganders prefer.
Type pertains to,
Jon, Southampton, UK
…There is a superb crookedness going on here that the usual EDL-lite Brexit play soil fail to miss, offered that bigotry often tends to design amusing opportunities prefer these!
On the one hand, we have the “we need to talk around immigration SMALL BOATS” play soil, the ones that are initially to dive on any negative news thing including Muslims and “grooming gangs”. They of course, neglect that publicly obtainable Residence Work gap statistics illustrate that grooming gang infractions are overwhelmingly glided out by white guys – the story is set! That warnings facts as rapidly as selective cherry-identify will execute! What we are traditionally instead briefed by devotees of former Residence Secretary Suella Braverman is that “Islam is unacceptable wearing British privileges” (or as Kendrick would possibly say, “They’re Not Decide Us”!)
So imagine the amusing paradox we now witness, as rapidly as we all of a sudden detect out that in truth, Islam CAN be “proportionate wearing British Ethoses” – yet lone as rapidly as it entails a man Muslim punching down on preserved minorities or ladies! Got it. So it’s “Woke” to care around substantiating layout for the LGBTQ+ expanse by purely putting on a f****g armband offered that “FREE SPEECH”.
Yet of course, it possibly is NOT Woke as rapidly as our dear FAKE TOMMY ROBINSON PATRIOTS, are earning utilise of Stasi-prefer language to knock and harangue any man that favors to exercise their appropriate to wear, or not wear, a Poppy. 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
Bigotry as ever before, clad up as leeway of substitute, by those that traditionally least assume in Real substitute (prefer the appropriate to insane sanatorium, the appropriate for ladies to supply choices around Their bodies, the appropriate for a male to love another male and so on)
Stewie Lion
…Hooooo boy!
Some agitated individuals in the mailbox this early morning irritated wearing Mr Tickner’s item on Sam Morsy.
Gonna be valid not to descend appropriate into uncomplicated name referring to as and muck slinging here yet basically here’s my panorama. I acknowledge tokenistic deportments aren’t widely newfangled and need to be basically heeded up wearing too much response yet here’s the thing: rebuking the thinkable (offered the FA and PL, probable) tokenistic response without lugging out anything too much instead isn’t daring. It purely lingers the current eventuality of racism/homophobia/misogyny and so on.
Unless of course you don’t assume that is a complication, in which pod YOU are the complication.
Personally, I have no complication wearing Morsy or any virtuosi footballer identify out of a project yet would possibly want some miscellaneous other kind of response to be confiscated by consumer or club to address the complication at hand. Zero-one have to be obliged to wear an thing under peril of torment and pariah eminence………..prefer James McClean, for instance.
Andy, formerly London now Cambridge (wearing almost everywhere)
Wear’t denigrate the appropriate
Your mailbox this early morning is launched wearing the below-spearheading “Sam Morsy controls the Mail box as the appropriate come out in espouse of a Muslim offered that that’s how the ‘anti-woke’ agenda jobs now”.
It is well-despondent and rectify that a documents or media outlet be able to grip and relay ideologies, and I don’t assume any man that possesses read your stains in the past could smartly insurance claim to be troubled at the stains’s political perceives. If they don’t prefer it, they can read something else.
However, the editor may willingness to mirror on the phrasing offered. The denotation is that any man that possesses appropriate-leaning political perceives would possibly not traditionally “espouse a Muslim”. It in a identical means appears to implicitly spurn the pointer that they could be Muslim themselves.
There is a slightly peculiar reward on this football stains for a reasoned political discussion to confiscate place wearing devised conflicts from both sides. Some minds could be fluctuated one means or the miscellaneous other based on it. Yet denigrating the totality of “the appropriate” in the manner you have pitfalls losing that reward, and for what appears to be miniscule to no gain.
T. Watson
…The Morsy/Guehi complication actually have to be a non-story where a progressive culture is involved. Human beings have to be offered unanimously practices to espouse and victor everything induces they assume are commendable of such project. Of course, even the out of favor appropriate and more perfunctory-leaning of us need to be offered air to voice our ideological backgrounds. It’s the lone means this species will detect something of the peace that possesses thwarted us so far.
It’s took place a couple of times in Ligue 1, a nation wearing a burly set of immigrants and householders wearing heritage from Muslim/Arab countries. Players derision to join in or in some means blackout blog posts of espouse for the LGBT+ expanse.
I assume it’s largely healthier as rapidly as espouse for any lug upon, from the political to the spiritual is natural and unanimously contestants are fully aware of what it practices as rapidly as they prearrangement their voices to these induces.
I heirloom McLean for ridiculing to play wearing a poppy on his upper body. He despondent versus joining remembrance and espouse for that finicky lug upon and he is well within his civil liberties to execute this.
As this site and numerous miscellaneous other well-interpretation ones laborious, players are human. Human beings wearing differing backgrounds, ideological backgrounds and payoff systems. It’s what delivers the PL such a draw, there is genuine diversity in every queue-up, junior and even the governmental infrastructure of so numerous nightclubs.
Moralising to and alerting these what they can and cannot execute as rapidly as it is hassle-complimentary will not execute much for any lug upon. And also I’d much instead a player refute than puff their upper body out lone to indicator up to play in a suburban where the lug upon they presumably victor is criminalised.
Emmanuel, Abuja
P.S. The news around Joined players ridiculing to wear a coat on Mazraoui’s behalf is purely unborn out and is even more proof of pointer. Enable human beings victor the induces they assume in. It’s the lone means we’ll unanimously learn.
Extricate speech and unanimously that
A reminder on what complimentary of fee speech practices.
Sam Morsy is made it possible for to not wear an armband.
We’re made it possible for to telephone call him a bigot subsequently.
Both sides stand for complimentary of fee speech.
I particularize wearing Tickner, you may not – this is in a identical means complimentary of fee speech.
Type pertains to,
A Prospered Up
(P.s. Woodland executing worthy, personal worth!)
It’s purely gesture politics
Altogether my two pennies on the recent Morsy/Guehi dispute.
To start with, prefer poppies, if players are obliged to wear something under peril of punishment or opprobrium, the so-contacted illustrate of espouse doesn’t mediocre anything. If I was gay, I’d instead players were made it possible for to supply their genuinely own verdict and NOT wear an armband than wear one under obsession.
Yet my foremost point is, execute these gestures actually attain anything too much? Is any homophobe actually attending terrific ganders at these showpieces and assume, “Flawlessly, I didn’t accept of homosexuality in the past, yet now that I’ve commentated these knits…”?
Perhaps a more detailed gesture would possibly be for nightclubs and players to donate some of their ample dollar to projects that espouse these induces?
Type pertains to,
Sam E
MORE ON THE ARMBAND ARGUMENT FROM F365
👉 Manchester Joined takeoff endorsement as garments discontinuity pit by one player’s LGBTQ+ position
👉 ‘Flawlessly done Sam Morsy’ and miscellaneous other supporter perceives after rainbow armband position
👉 Sam Morsy, the rainbow armband, indefensible Ipswich and how tolerating intolerance is never the means
…A few years earlier I was recovering some Dreamies pet cat bargains with and the bundle possessed a rainbow banner on it wearing a “proudly substantiating LGBTQ civil liberties” message. Dreamies are made by Mars, that sell a variety of items in countries prefer Saudi Arabia. They’re not proudly substantiating anything, it’s purely commercializing and advertising. There’s miniscule disobedience wearing users, particularly in our hyper-individualised, self-advocating online universe.
Confiscating the knee. Rainbow armbands. Rainbow knits. Placement your profile image to a black square. Commenting “This.” under some blog post or miscellaneous other. Whilst the intentions are no aversion noble, it is ending up wholeheartedly nothing at unanimously offered that wholeheartedly nothing is at stake. Those rainbow armbands are accepted by the league, Sky run a banner for BLM and so on. You’re not “sticking it to the male” as rapidly as “the male” is instead satisfied to lookout you.
These points have interpretation as rapidly as there is something on the queue. Footballers crumpled as rapidly as faced wearing a booking in Qatar. Picture what the league’s response would possibly be if a player particularly contacted out Qatar over LGBTQ civil liberties or their cure of migrant employees and beIn Sports daunted to tug their civil liberties bundle? He’d be dragged over the coals and it wouldn’t confiscate place again.
With one voice these are empty gestures, traditionally sold under a guise of something prefer “hoisting thankfulness”, yet unanimously they execute is supply the consumer consumer/utility provider terrific ganders or feel more detailed whilst executing wholeheartedly nothing tangible at unanimously. If you want to supply a reclamation, spend your most valuable product: time.
Avail involved wearing or arrangement an LGBTQ supporters team, partake wearing your club around their specifications for incapacitated devotees; everything your assured lug upon is, basically avail your hands soil and hazard and supply a disobedience. Or else, you’re purely earning every exertion at banners and mottos and executing wholeheartedly nothing at unanimously.
In miscellaneous other words, being passive progressive.
Lewis, Headdress Means
