Marcus Rashford is a player that did not even ‘illegal safeguard’ for Manchester Joined so he deserves no compassion.
And the day after that Hugo Ekitike red card, everyone is receiving shirty.
Send your mails to [email protected]
Securing Scholes, condemning Rashford
I understand why F365 reckons that Scholes has a Marcus Rashford obstacle.
Offered that if you refuge’t plunked on your own wearing each and every garbage match they have played over the last 4-5 years, and after that weigh that Rashford does play a couple of arcades a season instead well, you will ambiguity why Rashford is being targeted. But as someone that actually actually suched as Marcus Rashford, and has plunked himself wearing each and every minute of each and every game because 10-15 years now, make it possible for me enlighten you why Scholes is merely moral what every disciple feels.
Marcus is a local boy, that ruptured wearing and offered Joined devotees hope that this is the next off Academy player to be a celeb. He owned good talent, was an phenomenal human and owned the proper worths. So once he walks about the area for 80% of the match, actually not plunking 2 weighs to the proper to risk and safeguard or even illegal safeguard once Joined wear’t have the sphere, and is one of the laziest players I’ve viewed to poise the exchange, proper up there wearing Martial and the 40 year ratty Ronaldo tinkering for Portugal presently. And while the Ronaldo husk is simpler to understand and the rest of the group job 10% more tricky to suit him at the period of 40, there is totally no excuse the rest of the Joined group have to languish because Marcus cannot be tortured to implement a relevant job.
On the side of his awfully own box, wearing the sphere in front of him, he will merely walk about and make it possible for the opposition players seize vaccinations or walk past him wearing target. In EACH AND EVERY MATCH. It’s ridiculously compounding to watch commonly.
Twice or thrice a season, he will plunked in a functionality in which he is boisterous, runs wearing and without the sphere, and his judgment shuttling is on time. But the rest of the time, he is one of the numerous lazy, maddening and abysmal players on the exchange. After that comes his off-exchange presence of being late, going partying, not functioning wearing the group schedule in mind, once he was the poster boy for Manchester Joined, it with one voice mixes together to carry a withstand of grief and grief at what he can have been and what he has come to be. The significant wages Joined offered him play a portion in this vanquishment and for that I blame the management and board.
The single excuse I am enthused for Rashford racking up or tinkering well for Barca is so Joined can rip-off 30 million pounds off for him, which no one in their proper psyches would possibly otherwise commission along wearing his silly wages. Can he succeed at Barca and position his peace there. I truly dream him well, and unlike Scholes I am allayed for him if he positions a abode in the mesmerizing urban of Barcelona.
Aman
Society vulture
I wear’t think Matt Stead recognizes how society is embedded within significant organisations or in society at significant.
To seize Arteta and Arsenal as an example – I’m an Arsenal disciple and wear’t think the society is unblemished at Arsenal. But I think we can agree that Arteta has escalated it because he immigrated.
Which demonstrates that the company kits the crucial society (standards), the players have to loss in queue and if they wear’t the company criteria to be endorsed by senior leaders to apply the crucial standards. This initiates wearing disciplining the players and if they reinforce to misbehave they have to be much-off from the group and the bar. This has what has plainly arised at Arsenal.
At Utd both 10 Hag and Amorim have system standards. They initiated by disciplining players (shedding them/fining them) after that shifted to excluding them and after that selling them. This was plainly endorsed by senior leadership that permitted multi million extra pound assets to lose merit by excluding them from the first group.
Subsequently the managers and senior leadership have lugged out their assignments in keeping society and standards.
In conclusion what is disclaimed are the players that did not prosper Utd’s standards and society. And although it can be stipulated that what they are paid is irrelevant, my debate would possibly be that a) employees ordering 25k a year are intended to conform to supplier standards b) chief executives ordering 10m a year are intended to conform to supplier standards. Subsequently borrowers ordering 15m a year of training course have to be.
If they wear’t, it’s no one else’s fault. And tbh the stipulate this suburban is in demonstrates that plenty of borrowers no much longer feel accountable for their awfully own assignments or predicaments. Footballers are merely a microcosm of that.
Rojapy
Mikel Arteta: The cosmos’s numerous self-met male?
“I owned numerous things, on my handset, that can not think what we did to Manchester Municipal expanse. Human beings that are coaches, managers, CEOs, presidents. So autocratic, and I kind at the players and the borrowers about (the bar).”
Mikel Arteta ladies & jellyspoons. After probably shedding two times at abode versus an eminently beatable Individual Municipal expanse, in significant portion due to his reluctance to play one of the safest 10s in the league until it was too unpleasant not to.
Some foreordained relevant company is attending inherit this group and win the league.
RHT/TS x
Ekitike not deprived by Isak
I think that it is time to dial back this ongoing tale marketed by plenty of (including F365) of Ekitike being in some means disappointed/deprived by the wrapping up of Isak.
In the 2024/25 season, Liverpool owned two perpetrated number 9s (Nunez and Jota) wearing 4 unalike other senior players capable of ‘applying a job’ to differing extents (Chiesa, Diaz, Gakpo and Salah). In 2025/26 this came to be Isak and Ekitike, and Chiesa, Gakpo and Salah.
There was actually undoubtedly no opportunity of a group attempting to undergo an whole season wearing merely one recognised demonstrator, so two were habitually attending be forced. The truth that one of these conveniently reinvented out to be Isak might have pressed Ekitike from an intended launching semblance to back-up, yet doesn’t equalize the integral truth that he was habitually attending be competing wearing someone for his place. He was conceivable lugged out aware of this once he authorized.
After a good prelude to his Liverpool occupation, receiving himself sent out off in some of the dumbest predicaments prospective will have of training course not led him preserve his launching current over Isak, yet that has probably single quickened the unpreventable.
But, wearing the number of arcades that Liverpool are conceivable to play and Isak’s scarcity of pre-season and mildly patchy injury document, Ekitike will still avail plenty of initiates and replacement appearances. It therefore appears bizarre that the times he invests on the pew will expire outcome in coherent alarm system or grief on his portion regardless of what the media and specific borrowers BTL would possibly have you think.
Matt D, London
Ekitike t shirt talk
Ekitike’s humorous moment last night obtained me wondering what would possibly take place* if, instead of divulging a stretchy underwear a player has an attire numbered t shirt on under?
Certainly no DoCKers (ask your papa), I belong to Jesus, or unalike other blog posts. Simply an additional matchday t shirt.
The initial t shirt can after that be tossed to the congest. Would possibly love to go to the PGMOL risk and warrant a card for this.
DF (Tardelli snagged treatment of to preserve his t shirt on)
*Rhetorical actually, as amassing a minuscule t shirt scramble would possibly no uncertainty be pertained to as inciting a obstacle.
…Most explanation about why snagging your t shirt off is a bookable scoundrel activity. The IFAB components (time-throwing away, sponsorship visibility, dissuading devotees…) are a tad silly.
All they owned to plunked was ‘Ryan Giggs, Suite Park, 1999’. Certainly no one wants to risk coming across that.
Gary AVFC, Oxford (Soliciting shirty!)
…Hugo Ekitike’s second yellow card last night and Hesh’s email this early morning current the unblemished approach to study this in more accuracy.
The first thing to note is that detaching your t shirt to rejoice a urge came to be a yellow card scoundrel activity in 2004, yet was punished before under the more basic “inordinate commemoration” category. Ekitike was born in 2002, so for his whole football tinkering pep, he’s known he’ll be booked if he does that.
As Hesh times out, it’s a “garbage” mantra imparted how at some point protect the edict is, and how unblemished the unalike other group are by it.
But, the edict itself is just as as daft as the mantra. Probably it’s merely me. I’ve never ever before approved the reasonable relationship between racking up and snagging your t shirt off. It’s probably the numerous sizeable thing that doesn’t make sensation outdoor of a football context, yet even in a football context, it’s something borrowers acquired utilise of to implement and I’m not advised plenty of of them actually knew why, past it being something plenty of unalike other borrowers did at the time.
Ed Quoththeraven
…I am sure you will avail a million mails on unmodified thing yet longed to make it possible for Hesh (LFC) understand that players avail booked for snagging their t shirt off because the sponsors yearn their logo architecture on websites and in the records. If you kind at the back pages, ordinarily it is a urge commemoration pictured. Erections of mesmerizing eyeballs on the pc gaming supplier logo architecture.
Micki (you even avail booked for a Riise-oomph t shirt over the head) Attridge
